Pollo AI's feature list, read against the apps that name their models
Pollo AI's page lists its own models beside models from other makers, four plan sizes from 400 to 5,000 credits a month, and one to six parallel tasks. It names no individual model on the page read; Pippit names Seedance 2.5, Sora 2 and Veo 3.1 on paid plans, and invideo lists access to Seedance models. As of 2026-10-13.
1The register's rows behind this page
The rows where this register records an app naming the models it runs, and the publishing line kept at the other end of the same list.
- Plan featuresVideo generation with advanced models on paid plans; Seedance 2.5, Sora 2 and Veo 3.1 are named
- Plan comparisonScheduling and publishing to several platforms
- Plan featuresVideo generation with Seedance and other models
- Video generationPremium video models for generation, Seedance and Kling among them
- Plan featuresNew video from an idea or a link, with Seedance 2.5 and other models
- AI Video GeneratorText-to-video and avatars with its Seedance video generator
- AI toolsAI text to video and image to video, paid with AI credits
- PlansAI video and image generation counted in credits
- Premium planAI video clips and photo avatars on the Premium plan
- What comes out of an exportNo posting integration; the finished episode is downloaded and uploaded
2What Pollo AI's own page lists
Pollo AI's pricing page is a model menu first: its own models listed beside models from other makers, none of them named in the sentence this register read. Four plan sizes run from 400 credits a month to 5,000, one to six parallel tasks are spread across the tiers, and the page states that its prices are shown in the visitor's local currency — a detail the page carries about itself.
This register records no prices, and what it keeps for Pollo is the shape of the list rather than the figures: what is offered beside what, and how many jobs can run at once. Those are lines a buyer can still check on the day the numbers move.
3The apps that name the models they run
Naming a model is the line between a menu and a fact on this register. Pippit's page names Seedance 2.5, Sora 2 and Veo 3.1 among a paid plan's features. invideo lists access to Seedance models as a plan line. Zeemo's page names premium video models and the families it draws from. Revid prints Seedance 2.5 and other models on its plan card, and CapCut's tool page builds its generator on Seedance with avatars and templates beside it.
The reading rule is the same for all of them: a name is recorded only when the page prints it. A page that says premium models without naming one is recorded exactly that way, and a buyer cannot tell which family will run a generation until the menu says so.
4What the collection counted for two families
The model-share count kept for this subreddit puts Runway at a small share of the posts read, without a post count beside it, and the count for Kling stands at 8,089 posts and 1,318 comment mentions. Those numbers do not describe Pollo AI's menu, which names no family; they describe how unevenly the audience talks about the families such a menu can draw on.
That is why the naming line earns its own paragraph. A menu assembled from several makers moves whenever any one of them moves, and the only place to see the list is the app's own page, read on a day and compared against the next reading.
5Where the register's own rows point
SceneMixer's rows sit at the far end of the same question: one pipeline, with the generation route and the posting route both written down. Its publishing reading is manual — no direct post-to-feed — and its generation runs from a script composed for vertical from the start. Pippit, by comparison, lists multi-platform publishing as a plan line.
Read together, those rows describe two ways to sell a generator: as a workshop that names its tools, or as a pipeline that names its output. The tables below carry the app's own lines; the register page behind each one carries the sentence it came from.
6What each app's own pages state
| App | How a plan is shaped | What it says about prices | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pollo AI | Free, Lite (400 credits a month), Pro (800) and Ultra (5,000), with 1–6 parallel tasks | Shown in the visitor's local currency on its pricing page | 2026-10-13 |
| SceneMixer | “The Seedance 2.0 tiers render segments up to 15 seconds; use a Seedance 2.5 or Wan tier for 30-second takes.” | Not stated in this reading | 2026-10-13 |
Inclusion rule. Rows are the apps this page is about, each read on its own public page, plus the app this register reads like every other one. A point a page does not carry is written here as not stated in this reading, rather than guessed at from the app's other material. Order. Alphabetical by app name.
| Asked of all three | Pollo AI | Pippit | invideo AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Models the page names | Its own and other makers' models, none named in this reading | Seedance 2.5, Sora 2 and Veo 3.1 on paid plans | Access to Seedance models as a plan feature |
| What runs at once | One to six parallel tasks, by tier | Not documented on the pages read | Not documented on the pages read |
| Publishing | Not documented on the page read | Multi-platform publishing and scheduling | Not documented on the pages read |
| Watermark | Not stated in this reading | Watermark removal on paid plans | Not documented on the pages read |
Inclusion rule. Answers read from each app's own page as recorded in this register — the platform page on 2026-10-13, the app rows on 2026-09-25. A line a page does not carry is written here as not documented, which describes the pages that were read. Order. As the lines are listed above.
7What the community numbers came to
Two numbers below, from the collection behind this column: the share counted for one family, and the post count for another. The share line carries no post count of its own, and it is written here that way.
| App | Posts | Comment mentions | Positive | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kling AI | 8089 | 1318 | 382 | 120 |
Inclusion rule. Apps the collection counted and this page is about. A thread arguing with itself can land in both the positive and the negative column. Order. Descending by posts.
| Model family | Share of posts | Posts counted |
|---|---|---|
| Runway | 1.4% | Not stated in this reading |
Inclusion rule. Model families the collection put a share against, counted from the posts it read. Order. Descending by share.
8When the other app suits the job better
- The menu has to span several makers — Pollo AI lists its own models beside models from other makers, which is the shopping answer when the work moves between families.
- Several generations have to run at once — One to six parallel tasks are spread across the tiers — a throughput line rather than a quality one, and the sort of thing a batch schedule cares about.
- The plan has to be sized in credits — Four tiers from 400 credits a month to 5,000 give a buyer a countable allowance to match against a month of work.
Searches like "pollo ai reviews" land here, though a reading is what this page does: the app's own list, quoted and dated rather than scored. Beside it: PixVerse's off-peak mode and Revid's feature list.